Data Loss Detection is a SIEM use case in Secure60. It monitors how data is accessed, moved and exposed across the systems connected to Secure60, and raises a threat when that behaviour indicates theft, leakage or destruction.
Detection works from log and audit streams, not file contents. It covers data stores that content inspection cannot read, such as encrypted backups in object storage, and runs alongside any content-inspection DLP tool already in place.
Typical questions it answers:
Data Loss Detection follows the same three stages as every Secure60 SIEM use case: collect, detect, respond.
Secure60 ingests the log and audit streams from the systems that hold or move data. Any source that records who accessed what, when, from where and how much is usable.
| Source type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Object storage | S3 server access logs, AWS CloudTrail data events, S3-compatible storage access logs (Ceph RGW, MinIO, RackCorp S3). See Integrate S3. |
| Servers and file shares | Windows file access auditing, Linux auditd, SSH and SFTP logs, collected by the Secure60 Windows agent and Linux agent. See Linux auditd FIM and FIM audit configuration. |
| Databases | Database audit and query logs |
| Network | Firewall, proxy, DNS and NetFlow. See Firewall and network integration. |
| Identity | Active Directory, Entra ID, SSO and VPN logs |
| SaaS | Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace audit logs |
| Existing DLP tools | Alerts and events from content-inspection DLP products |
Collect and Ingest lists connection guides for every source.
Secure60 analyses the incoming streams in three layers:
When an incident is raised, Secure60:
Containment, such as disabling an access key or blocking an account, remains with the customer’s team and existing change processes. Secure60 supplies the evidence needed to act quickly.
| Category | Detections |
|---|---|
| Abnormal data volumes | Downloads well above the baseline for a user, key or data store; mass listing of buckets, shares or tables; large outbound transfers to new destinations; low-and-slow transfers spread over days |
| Anomalous user behaviour | Access at unusual times; new countries or networks; impossible travel; first-time access to a data store; dormant accounts becoming active; service accounts behaving like interactive users |
| Credential and key misuse | Access keys used from new IP addresses or networks; keys still in use after their owner has left; bursts of failed logins followed by success; the same credential active from two locations at once |
| Risky configuration change | Buckets or shares opened to the public; access policies broadened; encryption, versioning, object lock or logging disabled; new replication targets; firewall rules opening outbound paths |
| Destruction and ransomware activity | Mass deletes or overwrites; lifecycle rules changed to expire data early; old versions purged; retention shortened; backup jobs stopping or failing |
| Privileged activity | New admin grants and privilege escalation; changes outside approved change windows; the same administrator weakening controls and then accessing data |
| Exfiltration channels | Uploads to personal cloud storage and file-sharing sites; DNS tunnelling patterns; USB and removable media use; mailbox forwarding rules to external addresses |
| Correlated attack chains | Reconnaissance, privilege change, bulk access and a new outbound destination linked into a single prioritised incident across sources |
Each deployment is tuned to the customer’s environment: the data stores that matter, the users and keys expected to access them, and the thresholds that define unusual activity.
Data leaving through copilots, chatbots and AI APIs is covered separately under LLM Data Exfiltration.
Content-inspection DLP tools examine files and messages to classify whether sensitive data is leaving. Data Loss Detection evaluates who is accessing data, how much, from where, and whether the controls around it are being weakened.
The two complement each other:
Alerts from an existing DLP product are ingested into Secure60 and correlated with access behaviour. A single DLP alert combined with an abnormal download volume and a new destination becomes a high-confidence incident rather than one more alert in a queue, which raises detection confidence and reduces alert volume.
Many data stores cannot be inspected, or do not need to be:
A customer stores encrypted backups in an S3 bucket. Secure60 ingests the bucket’s access logs and the storage platform’s audit events, and is configured to alert when:
Combined with encryption, object lock and least-privilege access on the bucket itself, this provides the prevent, detect and evidence controls the customer’s requirement calls for.
Data Loss Detection provides evidence for:
| Framework | Control |
|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | A.8.12 Data leakage prevention, A.8.15 Logging, A.8.16 Monitoring activities |
| CERT-In Directions (India) | Log retention and monitoring of ICT systems |
| APRA CPS 234 (Australia) | Detection of and response to information security incidents |
Contact your Secure60 account manager, or support@secure60.io, to set up Data Loss Detection.